Skip to content

How do AI models rank Online Whiteboards?

The public record of what ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend. Ranked across 10 brands, dated at every close.

Model API
Share

Miro holds #1 on consensus, at 25.

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • GeminiMiro
  • Perplexity
Online Whiteboards: how 4 AI models rank the top brands. Each model column is ranked independently.
Consensus rankAPI + Search: measured on the official model API with web search enabledChatGPT#1 MiroClaude#1 MiroGemini#1 MiroPerplexity#1 Miro
1
MiroNo change from the last close
25
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#1100No change from the last close
Not named by Perplexity
2
FigJamNo change from the last close
21
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#285No change from the last close
Not named by Perplexity
3
MuralNo change from the last close
18
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#372No change from the last close
Not named by Perplexity
4
LucidsparkNew entry at the last close
15
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#461New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
5
ExcalidrawUp 4 from the last close
13
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#552No change from the last close
Not named by Perplexity
6
Microsoft WhiteboardUp 1 from the last close
11
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#644No change from the last close
Not named by Perplexity
7
ClickUp WhiteboardsNew entry at the last close
10
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#738New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
8
StormboardNo change from the last close
8
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#832No change from the last close
Not named by Perplexity
9
ConceptboardNew entry at the last close
7
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#927New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
10
Apple FreeformNew entry at the last close
6
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#1023New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
Swipe4 models

Understand the chart.

Full glossary

The record so far.

Consensus rank · top 5
123456789Jul 6, 2026Aug 10, 2026
MiroFigJamMuralLucidsparkExcalidraw
Consensus rank by close for the top 5 brands, oldest close first
BrandJul 6, 2026Aug 10, 2026
Miro#1#1
FigJam#2#2
Mural#3#3
Lucidsparknot ranked#4
Excalidraw#9#5

The receipts.

Recorded 2026-08-10 · 4 model answers

The unedited answers this ranking is scored from. We record what each model said, word for word. Nothing summarized, nothing editorialized.

ChatGPT10 sources

ChatGPT · Recorded 2026-08-10

My genuine default recommendation: Miro. It is the safest choice for most organizations because it has the broadest whiteboarding ecosystem—an infinite multiplayer canvas, extensive templates and integrations, and mature enterprise controls—though it can be more tool than a small team needs.

1. Miro — Best overall for cross-functional teams that need one flexible standard for workshops, planning, research, diagrams, and asynchronous collaboration.

2. FigJam — Best for product and design organizations, especially Figma users, because it is notably approachable and connects directly to design work while still offering serious collaboration features such as voting, timers, widgets, comments, and open guest sessions.

3. Lucidspark — Best for teams that already use Lucidchart or need to carry workshop output into structured planning, diagrams, tables, timelines, and task-management integrations.

4. Mural — Best for professional facilitators and organizations that run frequent high-participation workshops, thanks to unusually strong facilitation controls, anonymous/async participation options, and AI-assisted clustering and summaries.

5. Microsoft Whiteboard — Best value for Microsoft 365 and Teams-centric companies, since it works naturally in Teams meetings, supports Loop components, and adds Copilot-powered ideation without introducing another major vendor.

6. Canva Whiteboards — Best for marketing, communications, education, and brand-heavy teams that want to turn a brainstorm directly into polished visual content, presentations, or documents.

7. Whimsical — Best for lean product teams that prioritize crisp flowcharts, user flows, mind maps, wireframes, and lightweight documentation over elaborate live-workshop mechanics.

8. Klaxoon — Best for engagement-led facilitated sessions where voting, structured activities, multiple board/list/column views, and its Wrike-connected work-management path matter more than having the largest general whiteboard ecosystem.

9. Excalidraw — Best for technical teams and individuals who want a fast, delightful, sketch-style collaborative canvas with minimal setup, real-time link sharing, and an open-source foundation.

10. Collaboard — Best for European public-sector, regulated, or sovereignty-sensitive buyers that require European hosting or self-hosting/on-premises deployment without giving up real-time workshop features.

Short buying rule: choose Miro unless you have a clear ecosystem constraint: choose FigJam for Figma-first teams, Lucidspark for Lucidchart-first teams, Microsoft Whiteboard for Teams-first teams, and Collaboard when data residency or self-hosting is non-negotiable.

Clauderaw answer

Claude · Recorded 2026-08-10

Across G2 reviews, comparison sites, and analyst roundups in 2026, a fairly consistent consensus emerges. Here's my ranked take:

1. Miro – The most-recommended all-rounder; broad template library, deep integrations (Jira, Slack, Confluence), AI-assisted clustering/summarizing (Miro Assist), and enterprise governance make it the safest 'one tool for the whole org' pick, especially for cross-functional product/engineering/strategy teams.

2. FigJam – The top choice if your team already lives in Figma; its playful, low-friction UI (cursor chat, stamps, emotes) and tight design-to-dev handoff make it the easiest tool to get non-designers to actually use.

3. Mural – Best for teams that run structured, facilitator-led workshops (retros, design sprints, agile ceremonies); native facilitation tools like timers, voting, private mode, and 'summon' are considered unmatched, plus strong enterprise controls (SSO/SCIM, data residency) for regulated industries.

4. Microsoft Whiteboard – The default pick for Microsoft 365/Teams-centric organizations, with solid ink-to-shape conversion and native integration into the ecosystem you're already paying for.

5. Lucidspark / Lucidchart – Strong choice when you need whiteboarding that bleeds into serious diagramming (flowcharts, org charts, system architecture) with AI-powered diagram generation and integrations into Jira/Slack/Notion.

6. ClickUp Whiteboards – A good pick if you want whiteboarding bundled directly into a project-management/task platform rather than as a standalone tool, so ideas convert straight into trackable work.

7. Canva Whiteboards – Best for creative and marketing teams who want a whiteboard tightly linked to polished visual output, thanks to Canva's Magic Studio turning rough sketches into presentable assets.

8. Conceptboard – Worth a look specifically for EU-based teams or those with strict data-residency/hosting requirements, as it's frequently cited as the go-to Mural alternative for that reason.

9. Stormboard – A niche but credible option for teams running lots of recurring meetings that need lightweight, repeatable whiteboard templates rather than one-off workshops.

10. Whimsical – A minimalist, fast alternative worth considering if your team wants simple flowcharts, mind maps, and wireframes without the complexity (and cost) of the bigger platforms.

Bottom line: If you can only pick one, go with Miro for maximum flexibility and ecosystem support; choose FigJam if you're Figma-native and want ease of adoption; choose Mural if disciplined workshop facilitation is your primary need. The rest are solid picks for specific constraints (Microsoft shops, heavy diagramming, PM-integrated workflows, creative output, EU hosting, recurring meetings, or lightweight simplicity).

Geminiraw answer

Gemini · Recorded 2026-08-10

Here are the top collaborative whiteboard platforms recommended for buyers, ranked from strongest to weakest:

1. Miro: The absolute industry leader offering the deepest integration ecosystem and most expansive template library for diverse use cases. 2. FigJam: The best choice for design-adjacent teams due to its seamless connection with Figma and incredibly intuitive, lightweight interface. 3. Mural: Highly recommended for enterprise-scale workshops and agile ceremonies due to its robust, built-in facilitation and timer features. 4. Lucidspark: A powerful option for teams already embedded in the Lucid suite, offering seamless transitions from freeform ideation to structured diagramming. 5. Excalidraw: The top recommendation for developers and minimalist teams who want a lightweight, open-source, hand-drawn feel without corporate clutter. 6. Microsoft Whiteboard: The most logical choice for organizations heavily invested in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, as it integrates natively with Teams. 7. ClickUp Whiteboards: Ideal for project managers wanting to bridge the gap directly between visual brainstorming and actionable tasks in a single platform. 8. Stormboard: Great for structured sticky-note sessions and data-driven meetings where exporting whiteboard data directly to spreadsheets is essential. 9. Conceptboard: A strong contender for enterprise teams prioritizing strict GDPR compliance and infinite canvas capabilities for complex visual mapping. 10. Apple Freeform: A excellent built-in choice for users heavily entrenched in the Apple hardware ecosystem who want native, seamless cross-device syncing.

Perplexity10 sources

Perplexity · Recorded 2026-08-10

Miro is the strongest overall recommendation for a collaborative whiteboard because it is a widely used team whiteboard built for real-time collaboration and broad team workflows, making it the safest “buy once, use everywhere” choice.[3]

1. Miro — Best overall for most teams because it combines a mature collaborative whiteboard experience with strong team-oriented features and broad applicability across brainstorming, planning, and workshops.[3] 2. FigJam — Best if your team lives in product/design workflows, since it is positioned as the best choice for product design collaboration and pairs naturally with Figma-centric teams.[2][5] 3. Canva Whiteboard — Best for teams that want an easy, polished whiteboard plus a path into presentations and other Canva content tools after the session.[1] 4. Vibe Canvas — Best for hybrid teams that need software flexibility and hardware-room integration, which makes it especially attractive for meeting rooms and mixed in-person/remote collaboration.[2] 5. Boardmix — Strong pick if you want an AI-first collaborative whiteboard, since it explicitly brands itself as an AI online whiteboard focused on making collaboration easier.[7] 6. Jeda.ai — Good for users who want an AI-heavy whiteboard environment, because it advertises “18 AI Models, One Canvas,” suggesting unusually broad AI support.[9] 7. MockFlow IdeaBoard — Worth considering for teams that want a whiteboarding tool inside a broader ideation and design ecosystem, and one roundup calls it the overall best whiteboard tool for that wider workflow.[8] 8. Zapier Online Whiteboard pick set — Useful as a shortlist reference rather than a single product choice, because Zapier’s roundup is framed around the best online whiteboards in 2026 and can help you compare modern options quickly.[10] 9. Illumi’s AI whiteboard set — A reasonable discovery source for AI-focused whiteboards, but it functions more as a curated list than a clear standalone product recommendation.[6] 10. Canva Whiteboard alternative templates/ecosystem — Lower priority than the dedicated whiteboard leaders, but still credible if your real need is simple collaborative ideation inside a broader content-creation platform.[1]

If I were buying for a real team, I would choose Miro first unless the team is already deep in Figma, in which case FigJam is the smarter buy.[3][5]

How this ranking is measured850 queries · 4 models · updated aug 10, 2026Live data

This is the public record for Online Whiteboards: the same questions, every model, every close. We ask each model the real questions buyers ask in this category and record which brands it recommends and in what order. A brand recommended at position i scores 100 × 0.85^(i−1) for that model (#1 = 100, #2 = 85, #3 = 72, …); unmentioned brands score 0.

Each model is ranked independently, so the columns disagree when the models disagree. The consensus score is the mean across the 4 models recorded at this close, and movement compares against the previous close.

We report what the models say. We don’t editorialize, and brands can’t pay to change their position.

This ranking is live: the numbers come from recorded model answers captured through the official model APIs, scored with the published formula above. The raw answers are on this page under “The receipts.”

What we measure
We measure on the official model APIs: the same question, the same settings, the same week, for every brand. Web search is on, so the models can draw on what is live on the web. Nothing is personalized to a user, which is what makes the columns comparable.
What we don’t
The consumer apps are a different surface. What a person sees inside a chat app can carry memory, personalization, and live experiments on top of the same model, so its answers can differ from the API’s. We do not measure that surface yet. True browser listings, recorded from the consumer apps, arrive with WDIR Ranked, the Pro product. WDIR Ranked · Coming soon

Updated Aug 10, 2026 · week of 2026-08-10

The written record

Read the Best Online Whiteboards guide.

The same record as an editorial answer, with the reasoning spelled out: who leads, who is climbing, and where the models disagree.

Read the guide

Head to head.

Two brands from this ranking, compared model by model across every category they share.

Narrow the record.

The same question, tighter. Each refinement is measured the first time someone opens it.

Online Whiteboardsthis page