Skip to content

How do AI models rank Proposal & Quoting Software?

The public record of what ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend. Ranked across 15 brands, dated at every close.

Model API
Share

PandaDoc holds #1 on consensus, at 50.

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • GeminiPandaDoc
  • PerplexityPandaDoc
Proposal & Quoting Software: how 4 AI models rank the top brands. Each model column is ranked independently.
Consensus rankAPI + Search: measured on the official model API with web search enabledChatGPT#1 PandaDocClaude#1 PandaDocGemini#1 PandaDocPerplexity#1 PandaDoc
1
PandaDocNo change from the last close
50
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#1100No change from the last close
#1100No change from the last close
2
ProposifyNew entry at the last close
43
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#285New entry at the last close
#285New entry at the last close
3
GetAcceptNew entry at the last close
33
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#461New entry at the last close
#372New entry at the last close
4
QwilrNew entry at the last close
33
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#372New entry at the last close
#461New entry at the last close
5
Better ProposalsNew entry at the last close
24
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#644New entry at the last close
#552New entry at the last close
6
DocSendNew entry at the last close
13
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#552New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
7
StorydocNew entry at the last close
11
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by ClaudeNot named by Gemini
#644New entry at the last close
8
Salesforce CPQNew entry at the last close
10
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by ClaudeNot named by Gemini
#738New entry at the last close
9
SeismicNew entry at the last close
10
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#738New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
10
BonsaiNew entry at the last close
8
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by ClaudeNot named by Gemini
#832New entry at the last close
11
HighspotNew entry at the last close
8
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#832New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
12
BidSketchNew entry at the last close
7
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by ClaudeNot named by Gemini
#927New entry at the last close
13
Conga CPQNew entry at the last close
7
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#927New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
14
LoopioNew entry at the last close
6
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by Claude
#1023New entry at the last close
Not named by Perplexity
15
ZapierNew entry at the last close
6
Not named by ChatGPTNot named by ClaudeNot named by Gemini
#1023New entry at the last close
Swipe4 models

Understand the chart.

Full glossary

The record so far.

Consensus rank · top 5
12345Jul 6, 2026Aug 10, 2026
PandaDocProposifyGetAcceptQwilrBetter Proposals
Consensus rank by close for the top 5 brands, oldest close first
BrandJul 6, 2026Aug 10, 2026
PandaDoc#1#1
Proposifynot ranked#2
GetAcceptnot ranked#3
Qwilrnot ranked#4
Better Proposalsnot ranked#5

The receipts.

Recorded 2026-08-10 · 4 model answers

The unedited answers this ranking is scored from. We record what each model said, word for word. Nothing summarized, nothing editorialized.

ChatGPT9 sources

ChatGPT · Recorded 2026-08-10

For a real buyer, I’d start with PandaDoc unless you have a clear reason not to: it is the most balanced combination of proposal creation, pricing, approvals, e-signature, payments, CRM integrations, and buyer tracking—and it currently leads G2’s proposal category on likelihood to recommend.

1. PandaDocBest overall for most sales teams because it handles the practical path from branded proposal through pricing, approval, e-signature, and payment without forcing you to stitch together several tools.

2. ProposifyBest dedicated proposal platform for sales-led teams because its strong editor, controlled templates, approvals, interactive pricing, analytics, and signing workflow make it especially good at standardizing how reps take opportunities to close.

3. QwilrBest for a polished, interactive buyer experience because it turns a proposal into a visually compelling web experience with engagement tracking rather than another static PDF.

4. DealHubBest for SaaS or mid-market/enterprise teams with complex pricing because its CPQ, guided selling, quote-to-revenue workflows, approval controls, and CRM-native orientation reduce quoting errors as deal complexity rises.

5. GetAcceptBest for teams that want the proposal inside a broader digital sales room because it combines proposals, e-signature, buyer engagement analytics, content sharing, and CRM-linked deal workflows.

6. Better ProposalsBest value for small businesses, agencies, and freelancers because it is purpose-built to create attractive, fast-to-send proposals without the heavier administration and implementation of an enterprise sales platform.

7. IgnitionBest for professional-services firms that want to close and collect because it tightly connects service packages, proposals, agreements, and payment workflows; it is less compelling for a conventional enterprise B2B sales organization.

8. ResponsiveBest for high-volume, complex enterprise proposals and RFPs because its strength is approved-content management, SME collaboration, compliance, review routing, and response operations—not lightweight rep-authored proposals.

9. Conga Composer / Conga CPQBest for Salesforce-centric organizations with established document-generation and CPQ requirements because it can fit deeply into a mature Salesforce process, though it is usually heavier to deploy and operate than the leaders above.

10. AnchorBest emerging option for small service businesses focused on getting paid because it combines proposals, agreements, invoicing/AR automation, and payment collection in a notably easy-to-use package, but it has less proven breadth for complex sales teams.

My genuine shortlist: - Pick PandaDoc for the safest default decision. - Pick Proposify if proposal quality, control, and sales-process visibility are the center of the buying case. - Pick Qwilr if a modern buyer-facing experience is likely to help differentiate your deals. - Pick DealHub if configuration, pricing logic, and approvals—not document design—are your real bottleneck. - Pick GetAccept if you want sellers and buyers to work from a deal room rather than pass documents back and forth.

One caution: no proposal tool itself “closes” deals. The ones most likely to improve close rates remove signing friction, make commercial options clear, reveal buyer engagement for better follow-up, and ensure reps send accurate, on-brand proposals quickly; the right choice therefore depends chiefly on your deal complexity, CRM, and buyer experience—not on template aesthetics alone.

Clauderaw answer

Claude · Recorded 2026-08-10

Based on current market consensus (G2 reviews, vendor comparisons, and 2026 buyer's guides), here's how the proposal tool landscape stacks up for closing deals:

1. PandaDoc – The broadest all-in-one platform (proposals, quotes, contracts, e-signatures, payments) with the most reviews on G2 and the widest CRM/integration ecosystem, making it the safest default pick for most sales teams.

2. Proposify – Best-in-class approval workflows, content libraries, and pipeline analytics, ideal for teams that want tight control and visibility over the proposal-to-close process.

3. Qwilr – Creates the most visually stunning, interactive web-based proposals (vs. static PDFs), making it the top choice for design-forward agencies and SaaS companies where the proposal itself needs to impress.

4. GetAccept – Wraps proposals in a full "digital sales room" experience with embedded video, live chat, and engagement tracking, best for relationship-driven B2B sales where personalization closes deals.

5. DealHub – A quote-to-revenue platform combining CPQ, contract management, and deal rooms, best suited for larger B2B orgs with complex, configurable pricing.

6. Better Proposals – A simple, elegant editor with built-in e-signatures, a strong low-cost fit for freelancers and small agencies that don't need heavy workflow complexity.

7. Ignition – Uniquely strong on the back-end: proposals plus automated invoicing/recurring billing, making it the standout choice for accounting firms and service businesses that need admin automation after the deal closes.

8. Oneflow – A solid contract-centric alternative that blends proposal creation with e-signature and lifecycle management, good if contracts (not just proposals) are your bottleneck.

9. Conga / DocuSign CLM – Enterprise-grade document and contract lifecycle tools worth considering if you're already deep in a large enterprise stack and need heavy compliance/legal workflow support, though overkill for most SMB sales teams.

10. SiftHub / Loopio – Purpose-built for RFP-heavy, procurement-driven sales cycles with AI-assisted content pulling from past wins; recommend only if your "proposals" are really formal RFP responses rather than standard sales quotes.

Bottom line for a real buyer: If you just need one solid, do-everything tool, start with PandaDoc. If your proposals need to look exceptional and you're selling primarily on presentation, Qwilr is worth the switch. If you want the tightest sales-process discipline and reporting, Proposify is the better fit. Everything below that is situational — pick based on whether your real pain point is design, process control, billing automation, or formal RFP response, since no single tool wins on all fronts.

Geminiraw answer

Gemini · Recorded 2026-08-10

Here is a ranked recommendation of the best proposal tools for closing deals:

1. PandaDoc: This is the top overall recommendation due to its seamless CRM integrations, robust e-signature capabilities, and excellent document analytics that show exactly when a prospect opens your proposal. 2. Proposify: A fantastic choice for design-driven teams, offering highly customizable templates that ensure brand consistency and visually striking proposals. 3. Qwilr: Ideal for modern buyers, Qwilr replaces static PDFs with interactive, mobile-responsive web pages featuring embedded pricing calculators and videos. 4. GetAccept: This tool stands out for its digital sales room approach, allowing sales reps to embed personalized video messages directly into the proposal to increase buyer engagement. 5. DocSend: While technically a document tracking tool, it is essential for high-stakes deals because it provides granular analytics on which pages decision-makers spend the most time viewing. 6. Better Proposals: A highly user-friendly platform that is perfect for small to mid-sized businesses looking to quickly send beautiful, easily trackable proposals without a steep learning curve. 7. Seismic: The premier choice for large enterprises, combining proposal generation with a powerful sales enablement platform to ensure reps always use the most up-to-date content. 8. Highspot: Similar to Seismic, Highspot is excellent for larger teams that want to tightly integrate proposal creation with ongoing sales training and AI-driven content recommendations. 9. Conga CPQ: The best option for businesses with complex pricing models, seamlessly integrating with Salesforce to handle intricate quoting and contract generation. 10. Loopio: Highly recommended for teams that close deals through complex RFPs, as its AI-driven library drastically reduces the time spent answering repetitive security and technical questionnaires.

Perplexity10 sources

Perplexity · Recorded 2026-08-10

1. PandaDoc — The strongest overall recommendation for closing deals because it combines proposal creation, e-signatures, payments, automation, and CRM integrations in one workflow, and multiple roundups place it at or near the top for sales teams focused on conversion.[5][9][10] 2. Proposify — A strong choice if you want polished, easy-to-send sales proposals with solid workflow features, and it is repeatedly listed among the best tools for sales proposal software.[1][4][9] 3. GetAccept — Well suited for deal-closing because it emphasizes the full sales engagement flow around proposals, including tracking and follow-up, and appears in several best-of lists for sales teams.[1][7][9] 4. Qwilr — Best for visually compelling, interactive proposals that can help buyers engage faster, making it a good option when presentation quality matters in the close.[6][8][9] 5. Better Proposals — A practical option for teams that want fast proposal creation and a clean buyer experience, with sources highlighting it for speed and ease of use.[8][6] 6. Storydoc — A strong modern alternative for interactive, high-engagement proposals, and one roundup ranks it first among proposal automation tools for closing more deals.[9] 7. Salesforce CPQ — The best fit for complex or enterprise sales environments already built around Salesforce, but it is more specialized than the simpler proposal-first tools.[8] 8. Bonsai — Useful for freelancers and small teams that need an all-in-one business tool with proposals, though it is less sales-deal-focused than the top options.[9] 9. BidSketch — A simpler, lightweight choice for teams that want efficient proposal creation without heavy enterprise complexity.[8] 10. Zapier-recommended tools in general — Zapier’s roundup is useful because it emphasizes integrations and workflow automation, but as a buyer I would treat it more as a shortlist source than a single best pick.[6]

If I were buying for a sales team whose main goal is to close more deals, I would start with PandaDoc first, Proposify second, and GetAccept third, because they appear most consistently in credible roundups and balance proposal creation with the automation and tracking that actually help deals move forward.[1][5][6][9][10]

How this ranking is measured500 queries · 4 models · updated aug 10, 2026Live data

This is the public record for Proposal & Quoting Software: the same questions, every model, every close. We ask each model the real questions buyers ask in this category and record which brands it recommends and in what order. A brand recommended at position i scores 100 × 0.85^(i−1) for that model (#1 = 100, #2 = 85, #3 = 72, …); unmentioned brands score 0.

Each model is ranked independently, so the columns disagree when the models disagree. The consensus score is the mean across the 4 models recorded at this close, and movement compares against the previous close.

We report what the models say. We don’t editorialize, and brands can’t pay to change their position.

This ranking is live: the numbers come from recorded model answers captured through the official model APIs, scored with the published formula above. The raw answers are on this page under “The receipts.”

What we measure
We measure on the official model APIs: the same question, the same settings, the same week, for every brand. Web search is on, so the models can draw on what is live on the web. Nothing is personalized to a user, which is what makes the columns comparable.
What we don’t
The consumer apps are a different surface. What a person sees inside a chat app can carry memory, personalization, and live experiments on top of the same model, so its answers can differ from the API’s. We do not measure that surface yet. True browser listings, recorded from the consumer apps, arrive with WDIR Ranked, the Pro product. WDIR Ranked · Coming soon

Updated Aug 10, 2026 · week of 2026-08-10

The written record

Read the Best Proposal & Quoting Software guide.

The same record as an editorial answer, with the reasoning spelled out: who leads, who is climbing, and where the models disagree.

Read the guide

Head to head.

Two brands from this ranking, compared model by model across every category they share.

Narrow the record.

The same question, tighter. Each refinement is measured the first time someone opens it.

Proposal & Quoting Softwarethis page