Skip to content

4 AI models · 19 ranked · updated aug 10, 2026

Best Code Editors & IDEs, according to AI (2026).

There is no single answer. The models crown 2 different leaders at the latest close. Cursor holds the consensus #1 at a score of 46, but the model-by-model record below shows a genuinely contested category.

This guide is built from the recorded answers of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity to the real questions buyers ask about code editors & ides. We logged 2,100 of them this period, covering 19 tools. We report what the models said, in the order they said it. Nobody paid to be here, and we don't add opinions of our own.

Prefer the raw board? See the full model-by-model ranking. Every rank, every score, every close.

The models don’t agree.

Asked the same question, the 4 models named 2 different winners. ChatGPT and Claude and Perplexity picked Cursor; Gemini picked Visual Studio Code.

The ranked list

  1. #1

    Cursor

    No change from the last close

    Cursor holds the consensus #1 at a score of 46, with Perplexity placing it first outright.

    Cursor — My strongest overall recommendation for most developers who specifically want an AI-native editor, because it pairs familiar VS Code-style workflows with excellent codebase context, multi-file edits, autocomplete, and a capable in-editor agent.

    ChatGPT, this close

    Cursor – The leading AI-native editor (a VS Code fork) for developers who want the deepest codebase-aware AI, multi-file 'Composer' editing, and agentic workflows; best if you're tackling large, complex codebases and don't mind paying ~$20/month.

    Claude, this close
    Gemini#2PPLX#1compare head-to-head
  2. #2

    Visual Studio Code

    No change from the last close

    Gemini places Visual Studio Code at #1, even though it sits at #2 on consensus. That is a genuine split in the record.

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #12 on Perplexity, a spread of 11.

    It is the most contested name in this category. It carries the widest cross-model disagreement on the board.

    Visual Studio Code + GitHub Copilot — The safest all-purpose choice, since you retain the industry’s broadest extension ecosystem while Copilot now supports agentic multi-step work, file edits, terminal commands, tests, MCP, and model choice.

    ChatGPT, this close

    Visual Studio Code (VS Code) – The safest, most universally recommended pick: free, open-source, runs everywhere, has a massive extension marketplace, and now ships with Copilot/agent features that keep it competitive even against AI-native forks.

    Claude, this close
  3. #3

    Zed

    Up 3 from the last close

    Zed ranks #3 on consensus with a score of 22, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #6 on Perplexity, a spread of 5.

    It climbed 3 positions at the latest close.

    Zed — The best recommendation for developers who prioritize a very fast native editor, transparent configuration, local/model-provider flexibility, and strong agentic workflows without being locked into one AI vendor.

    ChatGPT, this close

    Zed – A blazing-fast, Rust-built, open-source editor that's winning over developers who prioritize raw speed, low memory use, and a clean, modern feel over deep AI integration.

    Claude, this close
    Gemini#6PPLX#6compare head-to-head
  4. #4

    GitHub Copilot

    New entry at the last close

    GitHub Copilot ranks #4 on consensus with a score of 21, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Visual Studio Code + GitHub Copilot — The safest all-purpose choice, since you retain the industry’s broadest extension ecosystem while Copilot now supports agentic multi-step work, file edits, terminal commands, tests, MCP, and model choice.

    ChatGPT, this close

    VS Code + GitHub Copilot — The best “safe” choice for most developers since it keeps the industry-standard editor while adding proven AI assistance and strong reliability.

    Perplexity, this close
  5. #5

    VS Code

    New entry at the last close

    VS Code ranks #5 on consensus with a score of 21, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Visual Studio Code (VS Code) – The safest, most universally recommended pick: free, open-source, runs everywhere, has a massive extension marketplace, and now ships with Copilot/agent features that keep it competitive even against AI-native forks.

    Claude, this close

    VS Code + GitHub Copilot — The best “safe” choice for most developers since it keeps the industry-standard editor while adding proven AI assistance and strong reliability.

    Perplexity, this close
  6. #6

    JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA

    New entry at the last close

    JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA ranks #6 on consensus with a score of 18, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #12 on Perplexity, a spread of 11.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

  7. #7

    Windsurf

    Down 3 from the last close

    Windsurf ranks #7 on consensus with a score of 18, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It slipped 3 positions at the latest close.

    Windsurf — A credible AI-first alternative to Cursor for developers who prefer its Cascade-centered, more proactive agent workflow, though I would personally try Cursor first because it remains the more proven default recommendation.

    ChatGPT, this close

    Windsurf – A very strong Cursor alternative from Cognition (the Devin team), with autonomous 'Cascade' agents and blazing-fast inference; great for solo devs and rapid prototyping who want AI to just get things done with less manual steering.

    Claude, this close
  8. #8

    Claude Code

    New entry at the last close

    Claude Code ranks #8 on consensus with a score of 15, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Claude Code – The go-to choice for terminal-native developers who want maximum agentic autonomy without needing a GUI at all, ideal if you live in the command line.

    Claude, this close

    Claude Code — Best if you work heavily in the terminal and want repo-wide reasoning for complex, multi-file tasks rather than a traditional editor-first workflow.

    Perplexity, this close
  9. #9

    Neovim

    Down 4 from the last close

    Neovim ranks #9 on consensus with a score of 15, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #12 on Perplexity, a spread of 11.

    It slipped 4 positions at the latest close.

    Neovim + GitHub Copilot — Worth recommending only to committed keyboard-first or terminal-first developers, as it preserves Neovim’s exceptional speed and customizability but currently gets Copilot completion rather than the richer agent-mode experience available in full IDEs.

    ChatGPT, this close

    Neovim / Vim – The favorite of keyboard-centric power users who value a highly customizable, terminal-based, distraction-free workflow and are willing to invest time in configuration.

    Claude, this close
  10. #10

    Playcode

    New entry at the last close

    Playcode ranks #10 on consensus with a score of 13, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Playcode — Best browser-based option when you want no installation and a highly guided AI experience that can generate code directly in the web app.

    Perplexity, this close
  11. #11

    Visual Studio

    Down 4 from the last close

    Visual Studio ranks #11 on consensus with a score of 13, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #12 on Perplexity, a spread of 11.

    It slipped 4 positions at the latest close.

    Visual Studio Code + GitHub Copilot — The safest all-purpose choice, since you retain the industry’s broadest extension ecosystem while Copilot now supports agentic multi-step work, file edits, terminal commands, tests, MCP, and model choice.

    ChatGPT, this close

    Visual Studio Code (VS Code) – The safest, most universally recommended pick: free, open-source, runs everywhere, has a massive extension marketplace, and now ships with Copilot/agent features that keep it competitive even against AI-native forks.

    Claude, this close
  12. #12

    JetBrains AI

    New entry at the last close

    JetBrains AI ranks #12 on consensus with a score of 10, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    JetBrains AI — A strong choice for teams already invested in JetBrains IDEs, because it layers good AI features onto an established professional development environment.

    Perplexity, this close
  13. #13

    Sublime Text

    Down 4 from the last close

    Sublime Text ranks #13 on consensus with a score of 10, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #12 on Perplexity, a spread of 11.

    It slipped 4 positions at the latest close.

    Sublime Text – A lightweight, extremely fast editor that's ideal for quick script edits, small projects, or anyone who wants a snappy experience without IDE overhead.

    Claude, this close

    Sublime Text: It is the perfect lightweight editor for making rapid changes and handling massive log files without the overhead of a full IDE.

    Gemini, this close
  14. #14

    Cline

    New entry at the last close

    Cline ranks #14 on consensus with a score of 8, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Cline — Worth considering if you want a more controlled, plan-then-act automation style inside VS Code and prefer hands-on oversight.

    Perplexity, this close
  15. #15

    Xcode

    New entry at the last close

    Xcode ranks #15 on consensus with a score of 8, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #12 on Perplexity, a spread of 11.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Xcode + GitHub Copilot — The best practical AI-editor option for native Apple-platform work, because it keeps you inside the required Apple development environment while adding Copilot chat, agent mode, completions, review, and checkpoints.

    ChatGPT, this close

    Xcode – The specialized, non-negotiable choice if you're building Apple platform apps, thanks to its tight integration with Apple's testing, profiling, and deployment tools.

    Claude, this close
  16. #16

    Continue.dev

    New entry at the last close

    Continue.dev ranks #16 on consensus with a score of 7, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Continue.dev — Best for developers who want maximum customization and are comfortable assembling their own AI workflow inside VS Code or JetBrains.

    Perplexity, this close
  17. #17

    Fleet

    Down 7 from the last close

    Fleet ranks #17 on consensus with a score of 7, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #12 on Perplexity, a spread of 11.

    It slipped 7 positions at the latest close.

    Fleet: JetBrains' modern polyglot editor is a great option for those who want a lightweight experience that can scale into a full IDE when needed.

    Gemini, this close
  18. #18

    Emacs

    New entry at the last close

    Emacs ranks #18 on consensus with a score of 6, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #12 on Perplexity, a spread of 11.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Emacs – A classic, deeply extensible editor with a devoted niche following, best suited for developers who want to mold their entire environment (not just code editing) around one tool.

    Claude, this close

    Emacs: It is recommended for developers who view their editor as an endlessly extensible computing environment rather than just a text editor.

    Gemini, this close
  19. #19

    Replit

    New entry at the last close

    Replit ranks #19 on consensus with a score of 6, scoring best on ChatGPT (#1).

    The models disagree about it more than most: #1 on ChatGPT but #11 on Gemini, a spread of 10.

    It entered the ranking at the latest close. A new name in the models' answers.

    Replit — A solid option for collaboration and fast prototyping in the browser, but it is less of a pure code-editor recommendation than Cursor, VS Code, or Windsurf.

    Perplexity, this close

Questions people ask.

What is the best code editors & ides according to AI?

Cursor holds the consensus #1 at the latest close with a score of 46 out of 100, ahead of Visual Studio Code. The models don't fully agree: 2 different brands are crowned #1 across the four models.

Which code editors & ide does ChatGPT recommend first?

ChatGPT's current #1 for code editors & ides is shown in the model column of the full ranking.

Which code editors & ide does Claude recommend first?

Claude's current #1 for code editors & ides is shown in the model column of the full ranking.

How are these rankings measured?

We ask each model the same buying questions on every run (2,100 queries this period), record the full answers, and score each named brand 0-100 by how early and how consistently it appears. Every question runs through the official model APIs, with web search on, not through the consumer chat apps, so nothing is personalized to a user. Each model is scored independently; the consensus blends all 4.

Do the AI models agree with each other?

Not fully. The four models crown 2 different #1s at the latest close, and several brands carry wide spreads. That is the gap between their best and worst model rank. That disagreement is a finding, not noise: different models read different sources.

This is the guide. The record has more.

The full ranking shows every model’s column side by side, 12 weeks of movement, and the methodology behind every number.

See the full ranking